Single-Port Laparoscopic Gallbladder Surgery in a Morbidly Obese Patient (BMI 45.7): A Case Study

Performing gallbladder surgery on morbidly obese patients is widely regarded as one of the more challenging scenarios in laparoscopic surgery. At St. Mary’s K Surgery in Incheon, we specialize in single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy — a minimally invasive technique that uses only one small incision through the navel. In this post, we share a recent case involving a patient with a BMI of 45.7 and a 3 cm gallstone, and walk through how single-port laparoscopy was successfully performed.

Patient Background

A male patient in his late 30s visited our clinic with worsening right upper quadrant pain and severe epigastric cramping after meals. He had been aware of gallstones for some time but had managed the discomfort conservatively — until the symptoms became too severe to ignore.

At 175 cm tall and weighing 140 kg, his BMI was 45.7, placing him in the Class III (morbid) obesity category. While this level of obesity adds significant complexity to any abdominal procedure, our center has extensive experience with single-port gallbladder surgery in high-BMI patients. In fact, we previously operated on a patient who was 185 cm and 150 kg just a few months earlier.

Gallstone disease is more prevalent among individuals with higher body weight, so our surgical team has become well accustomed to managing these challenging cases.

Preoperative ultrasound showing 2cm gallstone

Preoperative Findings

An ultrasound performed at a local internal medicine clinic showed a gallstone estimated at approximately 2 cm. However, the stone turned out to be significantly larger — over 3 cm — once removed during surgery.

This distinction matters clinically: gallstones 3 cm or larger are considered an indication for surgery regardless of symptoms, as they are a recognized risk factor for gallbladder cancer.

Surgical Details

Date of SurgeryJanuary 16, 2026
ProcedureSingle-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILS)
Hospital Stay3 days / 2 nights
Estimated CostApprox. 1,750,000 KRW (private room)

Why Is Gallbladder Surgery More Difficult in Obese Patients?

Obesity itself is a condition associated with chronic low-grade inflammation. When combined with an abdominal procedure like cholecystectomy, several factors increase surgical difficulty:

  • Thicker abdominal wall: Accessing the peritoneal cavity through a single umbilical incision requires more effort and precision.
  • Extensive adhesions: Chronic inflammation often leads to significant adhesions around the gallbladder and surrounding soft tissues.
  • Wider operative field: A larger abdominal cavity means instruments must cover greater distances, making maneuverability more demanding.
Laparoscopic view of peri-gallbladder adhesions in morbidly obese patient

Step-by-Step Surgical Process

1. Abdominal Entry and Adhesiolysis

After entering the abdomen through the navel, we found extensive adhesions surrounding the gallbladder. Careful adhesiolysis (separation of adhesions) was performed first, taking approximately 20 minutes due to the severity of the adhesions and the wide operative field.

Adhesiolysis in progress — separating soft tissue adhesions around gallbladder
Continued adhesiolysis revealing gallbladder after clearing surrounding tissue
Gallbladder fully exposed after completion of adhesiolysis

2. Identification and Ligation of the Cystic Duct

Once the adhesions were cleared, the cystic duct was carefully identified. It was first secured with a Hem-o-lok clip, then reinforced with an additional clip for a double ligation — ensuring a secure seal.

Hem-o-lok clip applied to cystic duct for first ligation
Double ligation of cystic duct using Hem-o-lok clip and additional clip

3. Ligation of the Cystic Artery

The cystic artery was also double-ligated. A reactive lymph node was visible just above the vessel — commonly known as the Calot’s lymph node (also called Lund’s node), which is frequently seen in cases of cholecystitis.

4. Gallbladder Dissection from the Liver Bed

The gallbladder was carefully dissected from the cystic plate (liver bed), taking care to avoid any liver injury. Once fully separated, the specimen was placed in a retrieval bag and extracted through the umbilical incision.

Beginning gallbladder dissection from the cystic plate (liver bed)
Careful separation of gallbladder from liver bed avoiding liver injury
Gallbladder fully separated and placed in retrieval bag
Gallbladder specimen extracted through umbilical incision in retrieval bag

5. Final Inspection and Closure

A thorough inspection confirmed there was no bleeding or bile leak. The operative field was clean, and the surgery was concluded.

Final laparoscopic inspection confirming no bleeding or bile leak after cholecystectomy

Specimen and Pathology Results

The extracted gallbladder showed significant wall thickening — a hallmark of chronic inflammation. The stone itself measured over 3 cm, larger than the 2 cm estimated on preoperative ultrasound. The patient received the gallstone as a keepsake.

Close-up of 3cm gallstone removed during cholecystectomy

Final pathology confirmed the diagnosis: chronic cholecystitis.

Pathology result confirming chronic cholecystitis

Recovery and Cosmetic Outcome

The patient was discharged on the second postoperative day. At the one-week follow-up, the umbilical incision site had healed remarkably well — with the surgical scar practically invisible.

This is one of the major advantages of single-port laparoscopic surgery: because the sole incision is made through the navel, patients are left with virtually no visible scarring.

One-week post-operative abdomen showing virtually invisible scar after single-port surgery

Cost of Single-Port Laparoscopic Gallbladder Surgery

The total cost for this patient — including the procedure, a 3-day/2-night hospital stay in a private room — came to approximately 1,750,000 KRW (roughly 1,300 USD).

At St. Mary’s K Surgery, we perform single-port laparoscopic procedures using conventional laparoscopic instruments rather than expensive robotic systems. This helps keep costs significantly lower while achieving excellent surgical and cosmetic outcomes.

Conditions We Treat with Single-Port Laparoscopy

Our single-port laparoscopy center treats a range of common surgical conditions using this minimally invasive approach:

  • Gallstone disease (cholelithiasis) and cholecystitis
  • Inguinal hernia
  • Appendicitis (appendectomy)

By relying on standard laparoscopic equipment instead of robotic platforms, we are able to offer high-quality single-port surgery at an affordable cost — without compromising on safety or results.

Considering Gallbladder Surgery?

If you are experiencing gallstone symptoms — especially persistent right upper abdominal pain or cramping after meals — we encourage you to consult with a specialist. Even if you have been told that surgery might be risky due to obesity or other factors, single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy may still be a safe and effective option.

St. Mary’s K Surgery — Single-Port Laparoscopy Center, Incheon, South Korea

Single-Incision Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair After Prior Open Abdominal Surgery (TEP) + Cost Guide

Single incision laparoscopic hernia repair is often possible even in complex cases—but prior open abdominal surgery can make the operation technically challenging.

Hello, I’m Dr. Hwang, director of the Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery Center at St Mary’s K Surgery clinic.

Recently, since opening the clinic, I successfully completed 100 single-incision laparoscopic cases. Among them were 52 gallbladder surgeries, 35 hernia repairs, and the remainder were appendectomies. I will continue doing my best to provide safe, high-quality surgical care for every patient.

In this post, I share a real case of single incision laparoscopic hernia repair using the TEP approach—even though the patient had a significant history of open abdominal surgery.


Case Summary

A male patient in his late 30s visited our clinic for surgery after developing a right inguinal hernia about two months prior.

Importantly, he had undergone an emergency open abdominal surgery (laparotomy) about three years ago for sigmoid colon volvulus (twisting of the bowel). At that time, he was told the situation was severe enough that a temporary stoma (colostomy) might have been required. As you can imagine, it was a major emergency.

As a result, he had a large lower abdominal scar from the prior open surgery.

Single-incision laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair case overview

Why This Case Was Challenging

For many inguinal hernias, we can use a laparoscopic technique called TEP (Totally Extraperitoneal) repair, which is performed in the preperitoneal space (outside the abdominal cavity).

However, when a patient has had a major lower abdominal open surgery, the key surgical planes are often disrupted by:

  • Dense adhesions
  • Scarred fascial layers
  • Distorted anatomy, especially in the lower abdominal wall

In a TEP repair, we must safely create and maintain a working space between the rectus muscle and the transversalis fascia. Prior surgery can make that space very difficult to develop.

Even so, the patient strongly wished to avoid another large incision—after having suffered through a major laparotomy before—so we carefully decided to attempt a single-incision laparoscopic TEP approach.


Surgery Details

  • Date: November 24, 2025
  • Procedure: Single-incision laparoscopic TEP (Totally Extraperitoneal) right inguinal hernioplasty
  • Hospital stay: 2 nights / 3 days

Key Intraoperative Findings & Progress (Simplified)

As expected, there were significant adhesions, and maintaining a clear view was not easy. In such cases, gas can sometimes enter the abdominal cavity, which may further reduce visibility—creating a difficult cycle.

Still, step by step, we carefully secured the preperitoneal working space and identified the correct tissue planes. Fortunately, we were able to find the boundary where the peritoneum “drops away” and proceed safely.

Hernia type: Indirect inguinal hernia

Once the space was created, the rest of the operation progressed smoothly:

Dissection of the hernia sac from the spermatic cord structures

Protecting the vas deferens and testicular vessels is essential.

High ligation of the sac (loop ligation)

Resection of the sac

Parietalization (pulling the peritoneum down to reduce recurrence risk)

Placement of a large mesh (10 cm × 16 cm)

    One major advantage of TEP repair is that we can place a wide mesh in an ideal plane, which is often difficult with incision-based hernia techniques. Because the mesh is placed in a deeper layer (behind the abdominal wall), it can also be advantageous from an infection-risk standpoint in properly selected patients.

    Another key strength of the TEP approach is that it allows the surgeon to evaluate and address multiple potential groin hernia sites and reduce recurrence risk through broad coverage.


    Incision & Recovery

    Because the surgery was done through a single incision hidden within the umbilical fold, there was no obvious visible scar afterward.

    Interestingly, the “before and after” umbilical appearance looked almost the same.

    This was a difficult case and took nearly twice the usual operative time, but we were able to complete the procedure safely using the single-incision laparoscopic technique.

    The patient was discharged on postoperative day 2.

    This case shows that single incision laparoscopic hernia repair using the TEP approach can still be feasible even after prior lower abdominal open surgery, when performed with careful dissection


    One Technique Doesn’t Fit Everyone

    The advantage of single incision laparoscopic hernia repair is minimal visible scarring with a fast recovery in selected patients. While I perform most hernia repairs using single-incision laparoscopy, the best approach depends on:

    • the patient’s overall condition
    • hernia type and severity
    • anesthesia suitability
    • bowel involvement (obstruction/strangulation)
    • whether mesh can be used safely

    Depending on the situation, we may choose different techniques, such as:

    • Open Lichtenstein repair under local anesthesia (for patients who cannot undergo general anesthesia)
    • TAPP (Transabdominal Preperitoneal) approach (in cases involving bowel obstruction or suspected strangulation/necrosis)
    • Desarda repair (a non-mesh option in selected cases where mesh is not suitable)

    If you are considering single incision laparoscopic hernia repair, we can recommend the most appropriate method after reviewing your hernia type, anesthesia suitability, and surgical history.


    Typical Hernia Surgery Cost (Guide)

    At our clinic, we treat common benign surgical conditions—inguinal hernia, gallbladder disease, and appendicitis—using single-incision laparoscopic techniques whenever appropriate.

    In general, these approaches can offer:

    • minimal or hidden scarring
    • less postoperative pain
    • faster recovery
    • low recurrence rates in properly selected cases

    Estimated out-of-pocket cost (typical example)

    The standard hospital stay for inguinal hernia surgery is 2 nights and 3 days. For a semi-private room (2-bed), the estimated self-pay cost typically ranges from $4,000 to $5,000 for patients without health insurance.

    Important: This is a general guide only. The final cost can vary depending on:

    • insurance coverage and benefit category
    • additional tests or imaging
    • anesthesia and medications
    • mesh type and surgical complexity
    • unexpected findings or complications

    If you’d like an estimate tailored to your case, please contact the clinic, and we can guide you based on your condition and insurance situation.


    Final Takeaway

    Even in patients with a history of major open abdominal surgery, a single-incision laparoscopic TEP repair may still be possible in selected cases—when performed carefully and with appropriate surgical planning. If you are considering single incision laparoscopic hernia repair, we can recommend the most appropriate method after reviewing your hernia type, anesthesia suitability, and surgical history.

    If you have been diagnosed with an inguinal hernia and want to discuss the most suitable method for you, we’ll be happy to help.

    To schedule a consultation:
    Please contact St Mary’s K Surgery clinic to discuss your diagnosis, options, and an individualized cost estimate.

    If you’d like to see a single-incision laparoscopic gallstone surgery case, please take a look here. link

    FAQ (Copy & Paste)

    Q1. Can you do single-incision laparoscopic hernia repair after open abdominal surgery?
    Yes, it may be possible, but it depends on the location of the previous incision, the expected adhesions, and the patient’s anatomy. Lower abdominal scars often make preperitoneal dissection more difficult, so careful surgical planning is essential.

    Q2. What is TEP, and why is it used for inguinal hernia repair?
    TEP (Totally Extraperitoneal) repair places mesh in the preperitoneal space without entering the abdominal cavity. It can provide wide mesh coverage and allows evaluation of potential groin hernia sites in a single operation.

    Q3. How long is the hospital stay and recovery?
    In many routine cases, patients can go home within 1–2 days. For complex cases or patients with prior surgery, the stay can be slightly longer depending on pain control and recovery.

    Q4. Is mesh always required?
    Mesh is commonly used to reduce recurrence risk. However, in selected situations where mesh is not suitable, non-mesh techniques may be considered. The best approach should be decided after individual evaluation.

    Q5. How much does hernia surgery typically cost?
    Costs vary depending on insurance coverage, room type, mesh selection, and surgical complexity. In our clinic, a typical example for a 2-night/3-day stay in a twin room may be around KRW 1.3 million out-of-pocket, but individual variation is expected.

    For reference: What is TEP/TAPP?

    https://www.sages.org/meetings/annual-meeting/abstracts-archive/laparoscopic-inguinal-hernia-repair-tapp-versus-tep

    Single-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in an Elderly Patient with Liver Cirrhosis: A Case Report



    1. Background

    Acute cholecystitis is a common surgical condition, particularly in elderly patients, and is frequently associated with gallstones. Advanced age and comorbidities such as liver cirrhosis may increase surgical complexity and perioperative risk. Minimally invasive approaches, including single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy, can be challenging in such cases but may offer benefits in selected patients.

    2. Patient Presentation


    A woman in her late 70s presented with several days of abdominal pain accompanied by high fever. She initially visited a local clinic, where abdominal computed tomography (CT) was performed, leading to a diagnosis of acute cholecystitis. Due to the need for surgical management, she was referred to our institution.
    At presentation, the patient had persistent abdominal pain and a body temperature exceeding 39°C.


    3. Diagnostic Assessment


    Contrast-enhanced abdominal CT demonstrated pericholecystic edema with inflammatory changes surrounding the gallbladder, consistent with acute cholecystitis.


    Bedside ultrasonography performed by the surgeon revealed:
    Pericholecystic infiltration with hazy inflammatory changes
    Marked tenderness upon probe compression, consistent with a positive sonographic Murphy sign
    These findings supported the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis.


    4. Surgical Management

    Date of surgery: June 23, 2025
    Procedure: Single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Length of hospital stay: 3 nights and 4 days


    The procedure was performed through a single transumbilical incision. Intraoperatively, advanced liver cirrhosis was noted, with an irregular nodular surface of the liver. The gallbladder was located deep beneath the rib cage, making exposure and manipulation technically challenging in a single-port setting.


    Despite these difficulties, careful dissection was performed. The cystic artery was identified and ligated first to improve visualization. The cystic duct was subsequently secured using clips and a Hem-o-lok device. The gallbladder was then dissected from the liver bed and removed without intraoperative complications.



    5. Outcome and Follow-Up


    Gross examination of the surgical specimen revealed gallstones with associated inflammatory changes. Histopathological analysis confirmed acute calculous cholecystitis.


    Postoperatively, the patient recovered without complications. The umbilical incision showed minimal scarring on postoperative day one. She was discharged in stable condition on postoperative day three.


    6. Discussion


    Single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly patients with severe inflammation and coexisting liver cirrhosis is technically demanding. Limited instrument triangulation and restricted visualization can increase procedural difficulty. However, with careful patient selection and meticulous surgical technique, this approach can be performed safely even in complex cases.
    This case demonstrates that single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy may be feasible in selected elderly patients with acute cholecystitis, despite unfavorable anatomical and inflammatory conditions.


    7. Key Learning Points


    Acute cholecystitis in elderly patients often presents with severe inflammation and systemic symptoms.
    Liver cirrhosis can significantly increase the technical difficulty of laparoscopic surgery.
    Single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be successfully performed in selected high-risk patients by experienced surgeons.
    Careful intraoperative strategy and precise dissection are essential to ensure safety in complex cases

    This case is presented for educational purposes only.
    All patient-identifying information has been removed.